Plenty of “Ands” and “Buts” About It: Supreme Court Snuffs De Novo Review of Claim Construction in Teva v. Sandoz
Feb 12th, 2015 by Jon Schuchardt | News | Recent News & Articles |
In Teva v. Sandoz, Justice Breyer starts thirteen sentences with “And” and six with “But.” Justice Thomas, in the dissenting opinion, counters by starting thirteen sentences with “But” and four with “And.” What makes this rhetorical device so effective for each writer?