Blog

The conditions for patent eligibility under Section 101, especially for process inventions involving artificial intelligence and machine learning, can be onerous at times. This handy visual guide can help inventors and patent attorneys sort out some of the strategies to get around potential 101 rejections when drafting claims directed to “abstract ideas.”

“For the fourth time in recent years, Michael Dilworth has been recognized by IAM among the top intellectual property professionals worldwide.

The IAM 1000 list of the world’s leading patent professionals is the industry’s foremost directory of the world’s top attorneys and firms working in the intellectual property field.”

Some software and computer inventions can be difficult to describe with words and illustrations alone. This can make it challenging for inventors to disclose inventions to attorneys, and for attorneys to draft strong patents.

Technology-driven enterprise with a fully integrated and aligned IP strategy is in the best position to increase their market share and enterprise value. Considering that over 70% of their value is derived from intellectual property, it’s clear that one of the most powerful ways companies can enhance their position in […]

Understanding the value of your IP more generally is a fundamental factor in making decisions around how to manage your portfolio. Patents and trademarks, for example, require regular investment in the form of annuities or fees to maintain your ownership rights. If a particular asset or group of assets aren’t contributing to the value of your company, then you need to decide whether or not to pay the money to maintain your proprietary rights. If you do decide to maintain your IP, perhaps you’ve assessed that the value of those assets lies in your ability to license or sell them. Having a clear framework for these decisions and opportunities can not only save money in paying fees but provide new revenue opportunities.”

In summary, ineffective communication between inventors and attorneys can be a recipe for weak patents and lost inventions. An industry-specific invention disclosure form (IDF) with narrowly tailored sections and precise prompts can organize and focus an inventor’s disclosure, making it easier for the inventor to write and the attorney to understand. Ultimately, such a well-crafted IDF can save time and resources and result in higher quality and quantity of patents from R&D activities.

As your organization comes into a state of full IP alignment, it is crucial to keep a disciplined eye on the broader IP landscape and on your competition’s innovations.

The sad story of Protégé Biomedical, LLC losing valuable trade secrets to a competitor provides a cautionary tale about being meticulous about getting NDAs signed and carefully reviewed to assure that when discussions begin, the parties at the table are the ones who are bound.

An integral part of executing a cohesive IP strategy is defining the daily work of your IP stakeholders. Of particular importance are the decision-making processes around what innovations need protection, and how to effectively capture those innovations as they emerge from your development teams.

The institution of an ongoing IP education curriculum as part of the regular working rhythm of your company is key to protecting your most valuable IP assets.